人妻少妇专区

Skip to content
Society & Culture

The mysterious aftermath of an infamous pirate raid

The port of Veracruz in 1615. (University of Texas Libraries photo)

Just before dawn on May 18, 1683, pirates stormed the port city of in the Viceroyalty of New Spain on the shores of the Gulf of Mexico, easily overwhelming its Spanish military defense. For two weeks, the buccaneers, led by the Dutch Laurens de Graaf and several hundred French and English associates, wreaked havoc. They raped and looted, pillaged and exhorted steep ransoms for the release of valuable hostages.

鈥淏ut the ultimate crime is what they did in the end,鈥 says , an assistant professor of history at the 人妻少妇专区. 鈥淭hey kidnapped the entire population of African descent, because slavery is expanding in the English and French colonies at this time and there鈥檚 now a market for such captives.鈥

Just before their departure on May 31, the pirates captured between 1,000 to 1,500 Veracruzanos and loaded them onto their fleet of 13 ships. Then they set sail for the pirate sanctuary of St. Domingue, modern-day Haiti. There, they sold their human cargo鈥攕ome slaves, some formerly free residents of Veracruz singled out by the pirates for their darker skin鈥攖o slave masters in St. Domingue, and nascent Charleston, South Carolina. While history remembers the violent raid on Veracruz, little is known about its victims.

鈥淭hat singular extraction and then dispersal of these people has never been studied,鈥 says Sierra Silva.

Pablo Sierra Silva teaching at the front of a classroom
Assistant professor of history Pablo Sierra Silva teaches his 鈥淪amba, Vargas, and Brazilian Identity鈥 class in Spring 2014. (University photo / Brandon Vick)

The historian joined the Rochester faculty in 2013, straight out of the doctoral program at the University of California, Los Angeles. His first book, , is due out from Cambridge University Press in March 2018.

But he鈥檚 already embarked on research for his second book, which will trace the paths of those forgotten Afro-Veracruzanos. Sierra Silva got a big boost this month when the awarded him a $50,400 fellowship to support the project, titled Mexican Atlantic: Contraband, Captivity and the 1683 Raid on Veracruz. 听

Sierra Silva will reassess Veracruz鈥檚 history by focusing on a moment in which free and enslaved men and women of African descent were made captives (in some cases, re-captives).听The grant will enable him to spend the next 12 months travelling to colonial archives and repositories in the US, Spain, and Mexico. He鈥檒l work at the Archive of the Indies in Seville, the John Carter Brown Library in Providence, Rhode Island, the University of South Carolina, the South Carolina Historical Society, and the College of Charleston.

Sierra Silva is also winning praise from his Rochester colleagues. 鈥淗e鈥檚 is a talented researcher and a valuable contributor to the overall strength of the School of Arts and Sciences,鈥 says Gloria Culver, dean of the School of Arts and Sciences. , an associate professor of history and chair of the department, says he is 鈥渢remendously excited鈥 about Sierra Silva鈥檚 NEH award.

鈥淧ablo richly deserves it,鈥 Lenoe says. 鈥淗is work on the history of African slavery in Mexico and its ramifications throughout the Atlantic World breaks paths into an important and understudied area.听Innovative and timely, it is also based on research in rarely used 17th-century archives.鈥

鈥淲e have fragments, little strands of evidence that suggest that, of course, people don鈥檛 forget.鈥

The project makes for a compelling historical mystery. With painstaking planning, the pirates originally took their high-value hostages, including Don Luis de C贸rdoba, the governor of Veracruz, and members of the Catholic clergy to the nearby tiny Isla de Sacrificios (Island of Sacrifices). Once the ransoms were paid, the pirates returned the hostages to Veracruz. But up to a fourth of the port city鈥檚 then small population of about 6,000 people remained captive. The captives鈥攑eople of African descent, many of whom had intermarried and intermixed with the Spanish and indigenous population, some already Veracruzanos in the second or third generation, were deemed mulatos, pardos, negros and morenos. Regardless, the pirates loaded them up and sold them into slavery.

鈥淭hey were gone overnight,鈥 says Sierra Silva. 鈥淚t鈥檚 a shocking human-orchestrated catastrophe鈥 that decimated the city by about 25 percent.

So far he has discovered archival references to five local women who were able to escape captivity in the Caribbean. Over the course of several years, they managed somehow to make their way back to Veracruz, arriving鈥攊n an ironic twist鈥攁s passengers on a Dutch slave ship.

It鈥檚 these scraps of memory that the historian is now seeking, as he lays out his case that the colonial histories of Mexico and the United States are intimately connected through the infamous 1683 pirate raid.

鈥淭raditionally in Mexican history we tend to be fairly insular,鈥 Sierra Silva says. 鈥淚t鈥檚 almost as if it weren鈥檛 entangled somewhere with the history of South Carolina, the history of St. Domingue. What I started to realize when researching this pirate attack is that, in fact, these colonial experiences are completely intertwined.鈥

In the months following the raid, no fewer than 200 Afro-Veracruzanos were sold in Charleston, which was still half a century away from the mass arrivals of the plantation-driven slave trade. At the time of the pirate attack, the English settlement in South Carolina was still in its infancy. The victims of the raid would have accounted for well over a fifth of young Charleston鈥檚 population of African descent.

By tracing the paths of those who disappeared, Sierra Silva鈥檚 project seeks to recover the experiences of enslaved people in numerous settlements throughout the Spanish, English, French, and Dutch Atlantic during the 17th century.

鈥淥f course, they leave relatives further inland. They leave cousins, business associates, godchildren. Part of this project is to look at how they remember the lost,鈥 Sierra Silva explains.

鈥淲e have fragments, little strands of evidence that suggest that, of course, people don鈥檛 forget.鈥