Rochester astrophysicist Adam Frank discusses why cognitive activity operating on a planetary scale is necessary to tackle global issues such as climate change.
The collective activity of life鈥攁ll of the microbes, plants, and animals鈥攈ave changed planet Earth.
Take, for example, plants: plants 鈥榠nvented鈥� a way of undergoing photosynthesis to enhance their own survival, but in so doing, released oxygen that changed the entire function of our planet. This is just one example of individual lifeforms performing their own tasks, but collectively having an impact on a planetary scale.
If the collective activity of life鈥攌nown as the biosphere鈥攃an change the world, could the collective activity of cognition, and action based on this cognition, also change a planet? Once the biosphere evolved, Earth took on a life of its own. If a planet听with life has a life of its own, can it also have a mind of its own?
Is Earth smart?
In , Adam Frank and his coauthors trace their attempt to account for the collective intelligence of all life on the planet. 鈥淢aking sense of how a planet鈥檚 intelligence might be defined and understood helps shine a little light on humanity鈥檚 future on this planet鈥攐r lack thereof,鈥� they write.
These are questions posed by Adam Frank, the Helen F. and Fred H. Gowen Professor of Physics and Astronomy at the , and his colleagues at the Planetary Science Institute and 听at Arizona State University,听in a . Their self-described 鈥渢hought experiment鈥� combines current scientific understanding about the Earth with broader questions about how life alters a planet. In the paper, the researchers discuss what they call 鈥減lanetary intelligence鈥濃�攖he idea of cognitive activity operating on a planetary scale鈥攖o raise new ideas about the ways in which humans might tackle global issues such as climate change.
As Frank says, 鈥淚f we ever hope to survive as a species, we must use our intelligence for the greater good of the planet.鈥�
An 鈥榠mmature technosphere鈥�
Frank, Grinspoon, and Walker draw from ideas such as the Gaia hypothesis鈥攚hich proposes that the biosphere interacts strongly with the non-living geological systems of air, water, and land to maintain Earth鈥檚 habitable state鈥攖o explain that even a non-technologically capable species can display planetary Intelligence. The key is that the collective activity of life creates a system that is self-maintaining.
For example, Frank says, many recent studies have shown how the roots of the trees in a forest connect via underground networks of fungi known as mycorrhizal networks. If one part of the forest needs nutrients, the other parts send the stressed portions the nutrients they need to survive, via the mycorrhizal network. In this way, the forest maintains its own viability.
Right now, our civilization is what the researchers call an 鈥渋mmature technosphere,鈥� a conglomeration of human-generated systems and technology that directly affects the planet but is not self-maintaining. For instance, the majority of our energy usage involves consuming fossil fuels that degrade Earth鈥檚 oceans and atmosphere. The technology and energy we consume to survive are destroying our home planet, which will, in turn, destroy our species.
To survive as a species, then, we need to collectively work in the best interest of the planet.
But, Frank says, 鈥渨e don鈥檛 yet have the ability to communally respond in the best interests of the planet. There is intelligence on Earth, but there isn鈥檛 planetary intelligence.鈥�
Toward a mature technosphere
The researchers posit four stages of Earth鈥檚 past and possible future to illustrate how planetary intelligence might play a role in humanity鈥檚 long-term future. They also show how these stages of evolution driven by planetary intelligence may be a feature of any planet in the galaxy that evolves life and a sustainable technological civilization.
- Stage 1 鈥� Immature biosphere: characteristic of very early Earth, billions of years ago and 听before a technological species, when microbes were present but vegetation had not yet come about. There were few global feedbacks because life couldn鈥檛 exert forces on Earth鈥檚 atmosphere, hydrosphere, and other planetary systems.
- Stage 2 鈥� Mature biosphere: characteristic of Earth, also before a technological species, from about 2.5 billion to 540 million years ago. Stable continents formed, vegetation and photosynthesis developed, oxygen built up in the atmosphere, and the ozone layer emerged. The biosphere exerted a strong influence on the Earth, perhaps helping to maintain Earth鈥檚 habitability.
- Stage 3 鈥� Immature technosphere: characteristic of Earth now, with interlinked systems of communication, transportation, technology, electricity, and computers. The technosphere is still immature, however, because it is not integrated into other Earth systems, such as the atmosphere. Instead, it draws matter and energy from Earth鈥檚 systems in ways that will drive the whole into a new state that likely doesn鈥檛 include the technosphere itself. Our current technosphere is, in the long run, working against itself.
- Stage 4 鈥� Mature technosphere: where Earth should aim to be in the future, Frank says, with technological systems in place that benefit the entire planet, including globally harvesting energy in forms like solar that do not harm the biosphere. The mature technosphere is one that has co-evolved with the biosphere into a form that allows both the technosphere and the biosphere to thrive.
鈥淧lanets evolve through immature and mature stages, and planetary intelligence is indicative of when you get to a mature planet,鈥� Frank says. 鈥淭he million-dollar question is figuring out what planetary intelligence looks like and means for us in practice because we don鈥檛 know how to move to a mature technosphere yet.鈥�
The complex system of planetary intelligence
Although we don鈥檛 yet know specifically how planetary intelligence might manifest itself, the researchers note that a mature technosphere involves integrating technological systems with Earth through a network of feedback loops that make up a complex system.
Put simply, a complex system is anything built from smaller parts that interact in such a fashion that the overall behavior of the system is entirely dependent on the interaction. That is, the sum is more than the whole of its parts. Examples of complex systems include forests, the Internet, financial markets, and the human brain.
By its very nature, a complex system has entirely new properties that emerge when individual pieces are interacting. It is difficult to discern the personality of a human being, for instance, solely by examining the neurons in her brain.
That means it is difficult to predict exactly what properties might emerge when individuals form a planetary intelligence. However, a complex system like planetary intelligence will, according to the researchers, have two defining characteristics: it will have emergent behavior and will need to be self-maintaining.
鈥淭he biosphere figured out how to host life by itself billions of years ago by creating systems for moving around nitrogen and transporting carbon,鈥� Frank says. 鈥淣ow we have to figure out how to have the same kind of self-maintaining characteristics with the technosphere.鈥�
The search for extraterrestrial life
Despite some efforts, including global bans on certain chemicals that harm the environment and a move toward using more solar energy,听鈥渨e don鈥檛 have planetary intelligence or a mature technosphere yet,鈥� he says. 鈥淏ut the whole purpose of this research is to point out where we should be headed.鈥�
Raising these questions, Frank says, will not only provide information about the past, present, and future survival of life on Earth but will also help in the search for life and civilizations outside our solar system. Frank, for instance, is the principal investigator on a NASA grant to search for technosignatures of civilizations on planets orbiting distant stars.
鈥淲e鈥檙e saying the only technological civilizations we may ever see鈥攖he ones we should expect to see鈥攁re the ones that didn’t kill themselves, meaning they must have reached the stage of a true planetary intelligence,鈥� he says. 鈥淭hat鈥檚 the power of this line of inquiry: it unites what we need to know to survive the climate crisis with what might happen on any planet where life and intelligence evolve.鈥�
Astrophysicist Adam Frank
A self-described 鈥渆vangelist of science,鈥� Frank regularly writes听and听speaks听about subjects like intelligent life forms in the universe, high-energy-density physics, space exploration and missions, climate change, and more.
Read more
Can the laws of physics untangle traffic jams, stock markets, and other complex systems?
Gourab Ghoshal is using the fundamental laws of physics to untangle the complex systems behind human behavior, urban planning, and social networks.
Do aliens exist? Are aliens real? Technosignatures may hold new clues
Adam Frank is searching for 鈥渢echnosignatures,鈥� or the physical and chemical traces of advanced civilizations, among the 4,000 or so exoplanets scientists have found so far.
We think we鈥檙e the first advanced earthlings鈥攂ut how do we really know?
In a compelling thought experiment, Adam Frank wonders how we would truly know if there were a past civilization so advanced that it left little or no trace of its impact on the planet.
