人妻少妇专区

人妻少妇专区

Rochester Review
September鈥揙ctober 2013
Vol. 76, No. 1

pdf image
Story as a PDF

Departments

Review home

Features

Taking CareCollege has long been a place for learning independence. But Rochester undergirds such lessons with a strong structure of support.By Kathleen McGarvey
care (Photo: John W. Tomac for Rochester Review)

In his junior year, a frenetic schedule began to overtake Eric Cohen 鈥13. He was trying to balance the demands of his major in engineering science with a consuming interest in drama that had him involved in the International Theatre Program, Drama House, student-run theater group The Opposite of People, and comedy improvisational troupe In Between the Lines. His health suffered from the erratic sleep schedule and eating patterns of on-campus life, due to his Type-1 diabetes. Taking insulin before a meal, as he must do, and adjusting the dosage based on what he鈥檇 be eating was difficult with dining hall buffets. And time was a problem, too. 鈥淚t can be hard, finding the five minutes to take my insulin. Things just get so hectic鈥攁nd grabbing some pizza doesn鈥檛 work.鈥

An overfull slate of extracurricular activities, academic pressures, difficulties sleeping properly and eating right鈥斺渋t became too much,鈥 says Cohen, of Cleveland, Ohio. 鈥淚 was struggling to keep a grasp on all my responsibilities.鈥 He was hospitalized twice for chest pains related to a heart condition.

And then one day, he received an email from Erin Halligan, assistant director for student support services. Someone鈥攎ore than a year later, Cohen still doesn鈥檛 know who鈥攁lerted Halligan to the difficulties he was confronting.

鈥淲hen I first heard from Erin, I was about to get kicked out鈥擨 wasn鈥檛 doing well,鈥 Cohen says. 鈥淚鈥檓 pretty sure that in her message, Erin phrased it that 鈥業鈥檓 here to help.鈥 And I was open to that.鈥

Halligan, who holds a master鈥檚 degree in mental health counseling and is completing a PhD in counseling education and supervision at the Warner School of Education, is the person at the core of a new鈥攖hough long-evolving鈥攕tudent support system at Rochester dubbed the Care Network. The network has developed into a resource nationally recognized for its comprehensiveness, responsiveness, and accessibility. It serves undergraduate students and graduate students across the University.

The system is a manifestation of a new way of viewing and handling student life. For several generations at least, college has been a place for making the transition to adulthood in an environment that is, to some extent, protected. In the later 1960s, the idea of in loco parentis, the institution acting in place of the parent, fell on hard times, and students became increasingly responsible for making their own choices鈥攁nd living with the consequences of poor ones.

But incidences of campus violence鈥攑erhaps most notoriously, mass shootings at Virginia Tech in 2007 and Northern Illinois University in 2008鈥攁long with heightened awareness of and response to sexual assault and other campus crimes have spurred colleges and universities across the country to assemble teams dedicated to addressing such problems.

Rochester鈥檚 efforts at enhancing student support began more than a decade ago. Matthew Burns, dean of students, says: 鈥淐olleges and universities are under an incredible amount of pressure to care for their students in new and different ways. But we were caring for our students the way people were being encouraged to after Virginia Tech long before Virginia Tech.鈥

The system focuses on helping students at the first sign of a personal or academic problem and on enlisting the entire campus community as a source of helping hands. Anyone鈥攁 faculty member who sees a reliable student suddenly failing exams, an undergraduate who sees a roommate reluctant to get out of bed, a facilities worker who finds persistent evidence of sickness鈥攃an use the system to let Halligan know that a student may be in trouble by filling out a simple online form known as a Care report.

鈥淭he reason the network is as successful as it is, is because it鈥檚 supported all over campus,鈥 says Halligan. All reports are reviewed within 24 hours.

Care App

This September a new Care Resource Center app debuts. It will help students connect with resources according to their concern, finding students鈥 locations using GPS in their phones and giving them directions to the office that can best provide help. 鈥淚t鈥檚 a way to connect students to resources from their dorm room,鈥 says Erin Halligan, assistant director for student support services, who oversaw the app鈥檚 development. Liz Rothenberg鈥攁 practice manager at the Education Advisory Board, a Washington, D.C., based group that analyzes best practices in academic affairs, student affairs, and other areas of higher education鈥攃alls the app 鈥渟omething that truly stands out. It鈥檚 really meeting students where they are.鈥

When the network was introduced two years ago, only faculty and staff could make reports, but last year it also became available to students and families鈥攊n fact, to anyone, on campus or off, who sees reason to be concerned about a student鈥檚 well-being. Several students have even reported themselves in an effort to find help efficiently. In 2011鈥12, the network received 525 reports, a marked increase over the 427 submitted the previous year. In 2012鈥13, after the system became accessible to all for reporting, Halligan received 927 reports, a 117 percent increase from the number just two years before鈥攁 rise she chalks up to greater accessibility and visibility for the system. Because of that growth, Halligan will soon be joined by a full-time coordinator who will aid her in assessing reports and reaching out to students.

Reports can be triggered by something as slight as a normally diligent student suddenly missing several class meetings, but the network also encompasses actions as serious as suicide threats. Because it can take relatively little to move the system to action, Burns calls the network 鈥渁s close to proactive as it can be.鈥

It鈥檚 the 鈥渇ruit of a long effort, and the end result is so thoughtful,鈥 says David Bevevino, senior analyst at the Education Advisory Board, a Washington, D.C., based group that provides best-practice research and advice to higher education leaders. The board highlighted the network for its methods of identifying students of concern, its transparency, and its marketing efforts to promote its use in a 2012 study of how colleges and universities respond to students in need of help.

鈥淚t鈥檚 a resource. It鈥檚 not disciplinary,鈥 Cohen says. He established a routine of weekly meetings with Halligan, who helped him to manage his time better and take better care of his health. He became such a believer in the program鈥檚 value that he has worked to spread the word, urging other students to take advantage of it. He led a discussion of the network after the performance of a play about gun violence in the spring semester in response to last December鈥檚 elementary school shootings in Newtown, Conn.

鈥淚鈥檓 definitely an advocate, 100 percent,鈥 he says.

The network evolved from a more typical form of student intervention: a weekly campus-conduct meeting that involved officials representing residential life, security, the office of the associate dean of students, and the University Counseling Center. The group evaluated security reports and decided how to handle issues of misconduct. But those involved realized that their efforts could be more effective if they could intervene with students before they reached the point of misconduct.

In the fall of 2002, Burns created the Student Support Network, a roundtable that brought together staff from all corners of campus鈥攊ncluding the College Center for Advising Services, the Office of Minority Student Affairs, chaplains, the bursar鈥檚 office, and financial aid鈥攖o help students while their problems were more manageable. But the group鈥檚 large size was both a strength and a weakness, raising issues of confidentiality.

To address that dilemma, Burns streamlined the process, using the software package Advocate by Symplicity to track students headed for trouble, with the concerns initially fielded by a single source鈥擧alligan, who began her position in fall 2011.

Richard Feldman, dean of the College, says: 鈥淲e thought the thing to do was set a quite low threshold, that if you just were concerned about somebody, you could identify that person and there could be follow up. And it might turn out that there鈥檚 not much of a problem; it might turn out that there is.鈥

Melissa Kelley, a health educator in University Health Service and a frequent participant in the network, likens Halligan to a detective, receiving clues to students鈥 situations and investigating to find out what kind of help, if any, they might need.

鈥淚 proceed on a case-by-case basis,鈥 says Halligan. 鈥淚 talk with the student, assess what their needs are, and get them to where they need to be.鈥 Some students need a counselor, whether academic or personal. Others, a psychotherapist. Some could use a mentor鈥攁nd others just need an adult to talk with once in a while. 鈥淎lmost everybody at the University has served in that capacity at one time or another, if they have something to do with students. Students who can鈥檛 find that person can find them through the Care Network, we hope,鈥 says Burns.

The issues reported were predominantly academic ones when Halligan began the job鈥攂ut once the system became open to all, she started to see more reports of emotional and mental health problems. And 鈥減roblems that ostensibly come from the academic realm may actually have their origins in emotional issues,鈥 she says.

Because anyone can file a report, the network gives 鈥渁n ability to get a 360-degree picture of a student鈥檚 life,鈥 says Eleanor Oi, academic advisor and director of orientation. That makes it easier for the University to intervene appropriately in cases where it might not otherwise recognize the need. And intervening when a problem is just beginning gives a student more options. Once a real crisis hits, the choices become more limited鈥 typically, hospitalization, medical leave, or withdrawal, says Bevevino. Early intervention also saves students and the University time and effort. 鈥淲e are trying to find students who are headed for trouble at the earliest possible moment so that the amount of resources it takes for both them and us to get them back on track is minimal,鈥 says Burns.

At the same time, he and others are mindful that the network shouldn鈥檛 create an environment that is overly watchful, coddling students rather than supporting them. 鈥淭here鈥檚 a balance to be struck, and it鈥檚 not crystal clear where the line is,鈥 Burns says. 鈥淭his is not a support system that should prevent failure altogether. If a healthy student makes the decision that they want to fail out of school, at some level do you have to say, you鈥檙e allowed to fail out if you want? You鈥檙e allowed to make bad decisions if you want. There are consequences, but we鈥檙e not going to prevent you from making the kinds of decisions that you have a right to make.鈥

The Education Advisory Board carried out research on current practices for what it calls behavioral intervention teams at more than 200 schools in the United States and Canada last year. Rochester鈥檚 system is a 鈥渕ature effort鈥 compared to what the researchers found at other schools, where intervention programs are mostly at earlier stages of development, says Liz Rothenberg, a practice manager at the board. In the wake of the Virginia Tech shootings, many schools established crisis teams, but didn鈥檛 advertise them broadly for fear of adding to anxiety, Rothenberg says, noting that Rochester has taken the opposite tack, making its services highly visible and widely accessible. Even the name 鈥淐are Network鈥 reveals a different emphasis, she says. 鈥淚n a lot of places, it鈥檚 called something like 鈥楾hreat Assessment鈥 or 鈥楢t-Risk Students.鈥 What Rochester has created is much friendlier. It鈥檚 easier to submit a 鈥榗are report鈥 than an 鈥榠ncident report.鈥 鈥

Kevin Allan 鈥14, a neuroscience major from Sharon, Mass., has seen the network from both sides, as someone who has submitted reports and as someone who鈥檚 had a report submitted on his behalf.

In 2012鈥13, Allan was a resident advisor in the Susan B. Anthony residence hall, where he oversaw 32 freshmen. As part of his training, he was taught how to use the network, and he referred students to it who were feeling homesick or experiencing other difficulties, such as having to miss exams because of a death in the family.

Like Cohen, he felt pressures mounting as the fall went on, from his responsibilities as an advisor, his own heavy course load, and his work as a teaching assistant in two classes. Someone, he doesn鈥檛 know whom, saw his stress level rising and submitted a report about him.

Initially, he was taken aback. 鈥淲hen you first see the email, you feel a little stigma: 鈥楽omeone thinks I鈥檓 not OK,鈥欌 he says. But meeting with Halligan 鈥渕ade life feel manageable,鈥 and he says he鈥檚 now thankful that someone alerted her to his anxiety. 鈥淚t shows someone cares about you, and took the time to write.鈥

Oi says the cumulative effect of so many people being able to submit a report is a kind of safety net that could never exist otherwise. 鈥淚f I meet with a student and I gather information, I may see one chunk of their life, where someone else sees another chunk, and someone else, another. If someone鈥檚 really in crisis, it can be that all of those little chunks moving together鈥 reveal the scope of the problem.

And for people, such as faculty members, who may become aware of a student鈥檚 problems without having the expertise to guide the student, the network is an appreciated resource.

鈥淭he idea here was explicitly not to ask faculty members to solve the problem with the student, not to intervene in ways they might not be comfortable doing, but just to have a place to let someone know,鈥 says Feldman. 鈥淭he network makes it really easy. I think that鈥檚 important. It鈥檚 extending the network of people who might be able to get something like this started to faculty, and now to students and families and others.鈥

Heather Layton, a senior lecturer in art and art history, has filed reports for about half a dozen students. 鈥淚t was a relief to get advice from colleagues on campus who had access to a broader range of information about the student. While the privacy of the student was entirely protected and the details of any situation were kept confidential, it helped tremendously to have validation of a situation and to understand whether or not I鈥檓 taking the right approach in teaching or advising,鈥 she says. It alleviates her own anxiety 鈥渢o know that there is a network of support on campus rather than it just resting on one person鈥檚 shoulders.鈥

The percentage of people seen at the University Counseling Center because of a report is small, says Brigid Cahill, associate director of the center. 鈥淏ecause people don鈥檛 know who we鈥檙e seeing, people sometimes file a report for someone who鈥檚 already in treatment here. People seem to get here on their own鈥攂ut for people who don鈥檛, and for whom there鈥檚 enough concern, I think that鈥檚 the valuable piece of Care: for students who are falling through the cracks, Care helps to catch them.鈥

When Bevevino looks at the network, he sees something distinctive. 鈥淚t鈥檚 part of what you do as a student, or a faculty or staff member, at Rochester鈥攜ou make a report and get students the support they need.鈥